Pons launch

$FLY FLYWH33L.fun

Launched 27 Sep 22:18 UTC by 0x1ead…58b8

0xf24300de35d9ba828ccd71b4ee77255910208800

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @flywh33ldotfun Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @flywh33ldotfun claims (it claims $FLY 0xff7a2363c8…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@flywh33ldotfun · 63 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 4 posts in 4 weeks

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing. Powered by $FLY

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

3rd token named $FLY. The first, $FLY, launched 3.4 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 224 other tokens within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 224 other launches; 210 were impersonators
Didn't buy at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	flywh33l.fun	unbound doesn't mention this token
X account	x.com/flywh33ldotfun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xf24300de….json