Pons launch

$FLY FLYWH33L.fun

Launched 27 Sep 18:53 UTC by 0x0fab…a60b

0xd912e71613a3435def79dd98d89f6b549eb8a744

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @flywh33ldotfun Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @flywh33ldotfun claims (it claims $FLY 0xff7a2363c8…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing. Powered by $FLY

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@flywh33ldotfun · 63 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 4 posts in 4 weeks

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing. Powered by $FLY

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

First token named $FLY. 6 later tokens reused the ticker

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Bought 4.64M at launch and has sold 100% of it

Launch

Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

Real holders: 1 after 30 min, 1 after 6 h

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	flywh33l.fun	unbound doesn't mention this token
X account	x.com/flywh33ldotfun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xd912e716….json