Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$FLY FLYWH33L.fun

Launched by 0x383f…8403

0xba0a64e74329ab01fec4e211ea4ac1237bc1ba16

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @flywh33ldotfun claims (it claims $FLY 0xff7a2363c8…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@flywh33ldotfun · 63 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 4 posts in 4 weeks

Next-gen (3,3) with real productive backing. Powered by $FLY

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 4th token named $FLY. The first, $FLY, launched 3.4 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched 3 other tokens within a week of this one
  • It hasn't sold out of any of its 3 other launches; 3 were impersonators
  • Didn't buy at launch

Launch

  • Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

  • Real holders: 0 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websiteflywh33l.fun unbound doesn't mention this token
X accountx.com/flywh33ldotfun contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xba0a64e7….json