Pons launch

$SAFIX SafixLabs

Launched 04 Oct 19:12 UTC by 0x81d3…22cc

0xb05613704f5ec340eef6534549033633e7fd4e7b

ImpersonatorFlagged 3 days after launch

Chart @orbsafixlabs Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $SAFIX the project's token?

No. Not the token @orbsafixlabs claims (it claims $SAFIX 0x036291b23c…).

@orbsafixlabs's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

4th token named $SAFIX. The first, $SAFIX, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/orbsafixlabs	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xb0561370….json