File No. 1225 · Orbio agent
$SAFIX Safix Labs
0xa389ff41789919334f1daf84b3c0729af0f41357
ImpersonatorFlagged 1.0 h after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—
Is this the project's token?
Not the token @orbsafixlabs claims (it claims $SAFIX 0x138a05737d…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
The project
Unlock USDG liquidity against tokenized equities and RWAs without selling your holdings. Built on @orbiodotso
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Score
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
Trader’s card
Original or copy
- 2nd token named $SAFIX. The first, $SAFIX, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.
In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.
Creator
- This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
- Didn't buy at launch
Owner and fees
- Extra creator fee of 1% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Agent treasury
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—
Who it points at
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| Website | safix.ai | named |
| X account | x.com/orbsafixlabs | contradicted |
Raw data for this file: 0xa389ff41….json