Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$SAFIX Safix Labs

Launched by 0x1b32…a951

0x56600aeb02541d994986d26f70f953752b14b8c3

ImpersonatorFlagged 3 days after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $SAFIX the project's token?

No. Not the token @orbsafixlabs claims (it claims $SAFIX 0x036291b23c…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 2nd token named $SAFIX. The first, $SAFIX, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 1% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websitesafix.ai unbound doesn't mention this token
X accountx.com/orbsafixlabs contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x56600aeb….json