Dossier

← New launches

File No. 986 · Orbio agent

$PEBBLE pebble

Launched by 0x1c1a…eae6

0x6147e011c98e1023f99a2dee2232087ef827ca5b

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—

Is this the project's token?

Not the token pebble.click claims (it claims $PEBBLE 0xad2d6fb66e…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 24th token named $PEBBLE. The first, $PEBBLE, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched 4 other tokens within a week of this one
  • It hasn't sold out of any of its 4 other launches; 4 were impersonators
  • Wallet active since 14 Aug 2025
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websitepebble.click contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x6147e011….json