Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$PEBBLE pebble.click

Launched by 0x6bc1…d50e

0x06fb9aeafcd41561f21544bb631032792987b36c

ImpersonatorFlagged 34.1 h after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @pebbleclick claims (it claims $PEBBLE 0xad2d6fb66e…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@pebbleclick · 86 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 6 posts in 4 weeks

say it. see it. ship it.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 20th token named $PEBBLE. The first, $PEBBLE, launched 43.7 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 1.5% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/pebbleclick contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x06fb9aea….json