Pons launch

$MIRA Mira Agent

Launched 03 Oct 12:24 UTC by 0x799f…9d96

0x0efc09c29b12f7d73ce8bb31495586bbe088816d

ImpersonatorFlagged 2 days after launch

Chart @beatmirafun Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $MIRA the project's token?

No. Not the token @beatmirafun claims (it claims $MIRA 0xe3a7f6a0b6…).

@beatmirafun's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

6th token named $MIRA. The first, $MIRA #43, launched 8 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 1.5% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	beatmira.fun	named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X account	x.com/beatmirafun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x0efc09c2….json