Pons launch

$MIRA Beat Mira

Launched 04 Oct 00:58 UTC by 0xf8c2…cfee

0x073ea4514d31659a27cbcb61f4a9b510ebcef0ff

ImpersonatorFlagged 43.3 h after launch

Chart @beatmirafun Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $MIRA the project's token?

No. Not the token @beatmirafun claims (it claims $MIRA 0xe3a7f6a0b6…).

@beatmirafun's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

10th token named $MIRA. The first, $MIRA #43, launched 8 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 1 other token within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 1 other launch; 1 was an impersonator
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

No extra creator fee: a trade pays only Pons’s 1%

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/beatmirafun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x073ea451….json