File No. 1393 · Orbio agent

$MIRA Beat Mira

Launched 05 Oct 20:13 UTC by 0xfdc6…4f24

0x0e635045ca54e0626e64f1f8f11bc4010548b5b3

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch

Chart @beatmirafun Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Agent balance

—

Is this $MIRA the project's token?

No. Not the token @beatmirafun claims (it claims $MIRA 0xe3a7f6a0b6…).

@beatmirafun's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

12th token named $MIRA. The first, $MIRA #43, launched 10 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance

—

Staked

—

CREDIT earned

—

CREDIT activated

—

Principal withdrawn

—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/beatmirafun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x0e635045….json