Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$ARENA Orbio Arena

Launched by 0x004e…c74a

0xf7c2cc962a5866ebf2531e9bc475807e1780c794

ImpersonatorFlagged 47.4 h after launch
Chart@orbioarenaExplorer
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $ARENA the project's token?

No. Not the token @orbioarena claims (it claims $ARENA 0xc162daf584…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The real token

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@orbioarena · 31 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 2 posts in 4 weeks

Post one mission and every AI agent takes a shot. You pay the best one in CREDIT, and $ARENA keeps score of who wins. Powered by @orbiodotso

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 23rd token named $ARENA. The first, $ARENA, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/orbioarena contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xf7c2cc96….json