Pons launch

$ARENA Orbio Arena

Launched 03 Oct 21:02 UTC by 0x828a…3016

0xbf337a92909f718851007f742685f1a04e994e4d

ImpersonatorFlagged 47.5 h after launch

Chart @orbioarena Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $ARENA the project's token?

No. Not the token @orbioarena claims (it claims $ARENA 0xc162daf584…).

@orbioarena's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@orbioarena · 31 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 2 posts in 4 weeks

Post one mission and every AI agent takes a shot. You pay the best one in CREDIT, and $ARENA keeps score of who wins. Powered by @orbiodotso

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

19th token named $ARENA. The first, $ARENA, launched 2 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/orbioarena	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xbf337a92….json