Pons launch

$TRENCHMOLE trenchmole

Launched 05 Oct 15:14 UTC by 0xbae5…222e

0xf6744ce0450eaed81f9ebd3dc645009ef41e6782

ImpersonatorFlagged 25.4 h after launch

Chart @trenchmolefun Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $TRENCHMOLE the project's token?

No. Not the token trenchmole.fun claims (it claims $MOLE 0x41dff8801e…).

trenchmole.fun

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@trenchmolefun · 35 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 20 posts in 4 weeks

another day in the trenches. keeping tabs on Orbio launches

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

First token named $TRENCHMOLE. 1 later token reused the ticker

1 2

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 1 other token within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 1 other launch; 1 was an impersonator
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	trenchmole.fun	contradicted claims a different contract
X account	x.com/trenchmolefun	not checked

Raw data for this file: 0xf6744ce0….json