File No. 1341 · Orbio agent

$TRENCHMOLE TrenchMoleFun

Launched 05 Oct 16:37 UTC by 0x65ec…b72e

0x31878c11a333c9fdd7736f75fbfdae50eeed7ffe

ImpersonatorFlagged 16 min after launch

Chart Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Agent balance

—

Is this $TRENCHMOLE the project's token?

No. Not the token trenchmole.fun claims (it claims $MOLE 0x41dff8801e…).

trenchmole.fun

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

The timeline moves fast. The chain leaves receipts. TRENCHMOLE starts with real Orbio launchpad data, direct source links, and a cleaner way to follow projects worth researching.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

First token named $TRENCHMOLE

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance

—

Staked

—

CREDIT earned

—

CREDIT activated

—

Principal withdrawn

—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	trenchmole.fun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x31878c11….json