Pons launch

$REVENUE Revenue

Launched 27 Sep 22:04 UTC by 0x84e0…6fad

0xe2ac1b6e0794ed6979c17c82e63707175876a46a

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @revenuefamily Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @revenuefamily claims (it claims $revenue 0x9e9df3ffed…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

The bridge out of X Money. Cash out to crypto, send crypto in, no KYC.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@revenuefamily · 183.2k followers · joined Sep 2026 · 13 posts in 4 weeks

The bridge out of X Money. Cash out to crypto, send crypto in, no KYC.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

5th token named $REVENUE. The first, $REVENUE, launched 2.6 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Bought 27.74M at launch and has sold 0% of it

Launch

Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

Real holders: 0 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/revenuefamily	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xe2ac1b6e….json