Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$REVENUE Revenue

Launched by 0xbbcd…bb06

0x897a99514d398b8e1df48e9e9058168d1e2f384c

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @revenuefamily claims (it claims $revenue 0x9e9df3ffed…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

A two-way bridge. Send dollars from your X Money balance and get crypto back in any wallet, on any network. Or send crypto and it lands as dollars in any X handle. No account, no identity check, either direction.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@revenuefamily · 183.2k followers · joined Sep 2026 · 13 posts in 4 weeks

The bridge out of X Money. Cash out to crypto, send crypto in, no KYC.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • First token named $REVENUE. 19 later tokens reused the ticker

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Bought 10.42M at launch and has sold 0% of it

Launch

  • Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

  • Real holders: 7 after 30 min, 4 after 6 h

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/revenuefamily contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x897a9951….json