Pons launch

$MOONLET Moonlet

Launched 04 Oct 00:20 UTC by 0xf274…15a5

0x376529c0acd702b7cffad8484bbe03ca36ff0bcb

ImpersonatorFlagged 17.4 h after launch

Chart @moonletxyz Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token 16labs.xyz claims (it claims $MOONLET 0xcace057167…).

moonlet.16labs.xyz

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@moonletxyz · 259 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 4 posts in 4 weeks

Your bag runs an agent. Powered by $MOONLET. Built on @orbiodotso.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

17th token named $MOONLET. The first, $MOONLET #37, launched 8 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 28 other tokens within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 28 other launches; 28 were impersonators
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 3% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	moonlet.16labs.xyz	contradicted claims a different contract
X account	x.com/moonletxyz	not checked

Raw data for this file: 0x376529c0….json