Pons launch

$Umbra Umbra

Launched 04 Oct 06:43 UTC by 0x9d11…fbbd

0xffff70f005df49d56bd979dae63b8e43cc3536e1

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @useumbraa Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $Umbra the project's token?

No. Not the token @useumbraa claims (it claims 0xbbd154b816…).

@useumbraa's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@useumbraa · 396 followers · joined Aug 2026 · 20 posts in 4 weeks

Umbra is a private AI workspace for asking questions, making images and video, writing code, and connecting your own tools. Powered by @orbiodotso

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

7th token named $Umbra. The first, $UMBRA #214, launched 5 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	useumbra.org	named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X account	x.com/useumbraa	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xffff70f0….json