Pons launch

$SPORE SPORE

Launched 04 Oct 00:19 UTC by 0xf988…e014

0xf303f99cc9f7563f4956c7254a870a8aeb5d7c19

ImpersonatorFlagged 41.6 h after launch

Chart @sporefyi Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $SPORE the project's token?

No. Not the token spore.fyi claims (it claims $SPORE 0xa5127fae2d…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@sporefyi · 247 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 18 posts in 4 weeks

Priors proved agents can be creditworthy. SPORE is the system that measures it, records it all on chain Ca :0xa5127fae2d0986a4cb6619b9c4ec53461726454b

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

4th token named $SPORE. The first, $SPORE #864, launched 13.3 h earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 1 other token within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 1 other launch; 1 was an impersonator
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

No extra creator fee: a trade pays only Pons’s 1%

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	spore.fyi	contradicted claims a different contract
X account	x.com/sporefyi	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xf303f99c….json