$OAK Oak Agent Kit
0xee4ad5fe185219d17b86d312731d39aa58aa5ce3
0xee4ad5fe185219d17b86d312731d39aa58aa5ce3
No. Not the token oakagentkit.org claims (it claims $OAK 0x6511c23379…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
Your AI agent on Robinhood Chain: swap, lend, borrow, deposit, launch a token, look things up. One install. Everything you need for the agentic economy.
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts. Dossier reads them throughout a launch's first day. After that it reads them again while people trade the token or look at its file: opening a file last read over a day ago queues a fresh read.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| Website | oakagentkit.org | contradicted
read |
| X account | x.com/oakagentkit | contradicted
read |
Raw data for this file: 0xee4ad5fe….json