Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$WITNESS Witness

Launched by 0x2def…c197

0xd63516422d9cd790fe407ea89ca1141a5773f9b9

ImpersonatorFlagged 5 days after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @wewitnessfun claims (it claims $WITNESS 0xc57767320e…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Street-level data for AI agents. Real-time foot traffic and Real CPI built from verified real-world captures. Pay-per-query via x402.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@wewitnessfun · 63 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 2 posts in 4 weeks

Street-level data for AI agents. Real-time foot traffic and Real CPI built from verified real-world captures. Pay-per-query via x402. Powered by $WITNESS

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • First token named $WITNESS. 6 later tokens reused the ticker

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Bought 27.78M at launch and has sold 100% of it

Launch

  • Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

  • Real holders: 66 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websitewe-witness.fun named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X accountx.com/wewitnessfun contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xd6351642….json