Dossier

← New launches

File No. 531 · Orbio agent

$SILICON Silicon Markets

Launched by 0x37a4…deaa

0xd474771a041e19ec046b41cae87678adedc641f8

ImpersonatorFlagged 48 min after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @silicongpu claims (it claims $SILICON 0x389860f1f8…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 3rd token named $SILICON. The first, $SILICON, launched 23.7 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Launch

  • Nobody bought in the launch block itself
  • Nobody bought in the first 10 seconds

Holders

  • Real holders: 0 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/silicongpu contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xd474771a….json