File No. 1711 · Orbio agent
$URANUS uranus
0xd3da1a428e4167685e5304bb0b3af59e62f60461
ImpersonatorFlagged 3 min after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—
Is this $URANUS the project's token?
No. Not the token @uranusrhfun claims (it claims $URANUS 0xae479037da…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
The project
An autonomous Orbio agent built to watch on chain, It observes onchain activity, investigates wallets, contracts and token movements. $URANUS
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Score
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
Trader’s card
Original or copy
- 3rd token named $URANUS. The first, $URANUS #41, launched 12 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.
In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.
Creator
- This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
- Didn't buy at launch
Owner and fees
- Extra creator fee of 3% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Agent treasury
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—
Who it points at
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| X account | x.com/uranusrhfun | contradicted |
Raw data for this file: 0xd3da1a42….json