0xcf7ece50088a91672a5b42d230e1cec3470f1560
No. Not the token orbitallayer.dev claims (it claims $ORBITAL 0x2328f8a8fc…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
OrbitalLayer posted about their new layer-1 blockchain. The background is building the next-gen orbital infrastructure. Its logo features concentric glowing rings.
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
@orbitallayer · 136 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 16 posts in 4 weeks
The first onchain privacy layer for Orbio. An AI agent audits your contract. The code stays yours.
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| Website | orbitallayer.dev | contradicted |
| X account | x.com/orbitallayer | named |
Raw data for this file: 0xcf7ece50….json