File No. 1628 · Orbio agent

$ORBIUM Orbium Labs

Launched 06 Oct 23:21 UTC by 0xf1da…b48e

0xc9111f31992ea8664795da8ecfad13d8251e3b77

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch

Chart @orbiumlabs Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Agent balance

—

Is this $ORBIUM the project's token?

No. Not the token @orbiumlabs claims (it claims $ORBIUM 0x3947d9edd5…).

@orbiumlabs's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

3rd token named $ORBIUM. The first, $ORBIUM, launched 3.2 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 1 other token within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 1 other launch; 1 was an impersonator
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance

—

Staked

—

CREDIT earned

—

CREDIT activated

—

Principal withdrawn

—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/orbiumlabs	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xc9111f31….json