Pons launch

$INTERN Intern Money

Launched 05 Oct 17:25 UTC by 0x80ae…e624

0xc5b1d5d2a118c9632d7c17d88dce8d007f920d69

ImpersonatorFlagged 24.0 h after launch

Chart @intern_money Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $INTERN the project's token?

No. Not the token @intern_money claims (it claims $INTERN 0x7ef5446695…).

@intern_money's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

6th token named $INTERN. The first, $INTERN #35, launched 10 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 0.5% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/intern_money	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xc5b1d5d2….json