File No. 1260 · Orbio agent

$SPYDERNET Spydernet

Launched 04 Oct 22:08 UTC by 0xa1d1…9a27

0xc35871aa8316c1d25eca8e77f6c32196bf65d67a

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch

Chart @spyder_nwk Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Agent balance

—

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @spyder_nwk claims (it claims $SPYDERNET 0x91f254a752…).

@spyder_nwk's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $SPYDERNET. The first, $SPYDERNET, launched 6 min earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance

—

Staked

—

CREDIT earned

—

CREDIT activated

—

Principal withdrawn

—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/spyder_nwk	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xc35871aa….json