Pons launch

$ORBIANS Orbians

Launched 03 Oct 12:12 UTC by 0x5413…1e62

0xc31012795e6101a1246fb2831525e8af8806a9ba

ImpersonatorFlagged 3 days after launch

Chart @orbiansx Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $ORBIANS the project's token?

No. Not the token orbians.lol claims (it claims 0x816b…78bf1…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@orbiansx · 68 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 11 posts in 4 weeks

Orbios is a species of 3,333 unique celestials marble spheres born inside the @Orbiodotso ecosystem, https://t.co/irpmWkLOsj

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

4th token named $ORBIANS. The first, $ORBIANS #647, launched 33.6 h earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 10% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	orbians.lol	contradicted claims a different contract
X account	x.com/orbiansx	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xc3101279….json