Pons launch

$INVK invokrAI

Launched 04 Oct 05:27 UTC by 0x0942…5dab

0xb6c335fc70f1f8b54c172b755226a02b61ba8b74

ImpersonatorFlagged 2 days after launch

Chart @invokr_ai Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $INVK the project's token?

No. Not the token @invokr_ai claims (it claims $INVK 0xd951c5bcb2…).

@invokr_ai's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@invokr_ai · 22 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 0 posts in 4 weeks

Every AI model. One wallet. Chat, code, images and video, paid per call in crypto. Hold $INVK, pay 6%. Built on Robinhood Chain.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $INVK. The first, $INVK #901, launched 14.7 h earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 1% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/invokr_ai	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xb6c335fc….json