Pons launch

$INFERA Infera

Launched 28 Sep 06:09 UTC by 0x68f8…a58c

0xa04795e9673ac2eec5076e545764dc708df8ccf7

ImpersonatorFlagged 11 days after launch

Chart @useinfera Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $INFERA the project's token?

No. Not the token @useinfera claims (it claims $INFERA 0x7f98ecdca0…).

@useinfera's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Build, launch & integrate AI agents. Powered by Orbio. Onchain with Pons

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $INFERA. The first, $INFERA, launched 29 min earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Bought 39.91M at launch and has sold 0% of it

Launch

Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

Real holders: 15 after 30 min

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/useinfera	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xa04795e9….json