Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$VETO vetoprotocol

Launched by 0x4428…1bc6

0x5a13a55e2348a722b215931f3e2f1afffff64660

ImpersonatorFlagged 3 days after launch
Market cap
—
Change
—
24h volume
—
24h buys / sells
—
Price
—
Curve
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @vetoprotocol claims (it claims $VETO 0x0d099caf7e…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project

Building control infrastructure for the agentic era. Defining what autonomous systems can access, execute and delegate.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@vetoprotocol · 69 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 8 posts in 4 weeks

Building control infrastructure for the agentic era. Defining what autonomous systems can access, execute and delegate.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • First token named $VETO. 8 later tokens reused the ticker

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Bought 4.64M at launch and has sold 100% of it

Launch

  • Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

  • Real holders: 0 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websitevetoprotocol.live named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X accountx.com/vetoprotocol contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x5a13a55e….json