$CUE Cue Agents
0x53873ac242cd872aabeebb09c61e8ce7989039a7
0x53873ac242cd872aabeebb09c61e8ce7989039a7
No. Not the token @cueagents claims (it claims $CUE 0xf125a5ba63…); last seen 16 Oct.
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
Your personal agents, on Cue.
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts. Dossier reads them throughout a launch's first day. After that it reads them again while people trade the token or look at its file: opening a file last read over a day ago queues a fresh read.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| X account | x.com/cueagents | named
read |
Raw data for this file: 0x53873ac2….json