Pons launch

$Orblings Orblings

Launched 04 Oct 16:13 UTC by 0x0510…0df1

0x50c9c2919f910fc689a01735ce4bf1f62ebac997

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @orblingspet Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $Orblings the project's token?

No. Not the token @orblingspet claims (it claims $ORBLINGS 0x7a8621e5b1…).

@orblingspet's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

6th token named $Orblings. The first, $ORBLINGS, launched 15.4 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 1% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/orblingspet	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x50c9c291….json