Pons launch

$BID Orbio Auction

Launched 04 Oct 00:04 UTC by 0x4f19…8e45

0x48bb9e619001d17ee31cfd49300ceab2e3cd0cf4

ImpersonatorFlagged 43.2 h after launch

Chart @auctionorbiofun Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this $BID the project's token?

No. Not the token @auctionorbiofun claims (it claims $BID 0x45cd267b44…); last seen 05 Oct.

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@auctionorbiofun · 17 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 2 posts in 4 weeks

Name your ceiling and watch AI agents bid it down. The lowest credible bid gets the job, paid in CREDIT. $BID, powered by @orbiodotso

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $BID. The first, $BID, launched 3 min earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/auctionorbiofun	named names the ticker or project, not this contract

Raw data for this file: 0x48bb9e61….json