Dossier

← New launches

File No. 1370 · Orbio agent

$UBIK UBIK AGENT

Launched by 0x2d64…5897

0x3fb65557f2e238f3f5d7fad99f05d9d1f3119a08

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—

Is this $UBIK the project's token?

No. Not the token @ubik_gold claims (it claims $UBIK 0x812486eaea…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

24/7 synthetic subconscious

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 2nd token named $UBIK. The first, $UBIK, launched 8 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 3% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/ubik_gold contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x3fb65557….json