Dossier

← New launches

Pons launch

$TANK TANK

Launched by 0xf274…15a5

0x2e2f8e169c1e0e09bfc5871e1ea972d67ceb35ec

ImpersonatorFlagged 23.5 h after launch
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @thelivingtank claims (it claims $TANK 0x80ae70cfcb…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@thelivingtank · 539 followers · joined Aug 2026 · 20 posts in 4 weeks

A living underwater world. Built by agents. Played by you. Powered by $TANK. Built on @orbiodotso. 0x80ae70cfcb6725ea7f5ace439eb3e56518131299

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 25th token named $TANK. The first, $TANK #178, launched 5 days earlier. Check which one the project claims.

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched 28 other tokens within a week of this one
  • It hasn't sold out of any of its 28 other launches; 28 were impersonators
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 2.5% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%, fixed at launch

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
Websitethelivingtank.xyz named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X accountx.com/thelivingtank contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x2e2f8e16….json