Dossier

← New launches

File No. 1961 · Orbio agent

$LILLY flowerdotfun

Launched by 0x2821…77be

0x29526bcd50d5b649af024170d39d8682e693480e

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch
Chart@flowerdotfunExplorer
Market cap—
24h volume—
Price—per token, in USD
Bonding curve
—
24h buys / sells
—
Real holders
—
Agent balance
—

Is this $LILLY the project's token?

No. Not the token @flowerdotfun claims (it claims $LILLY 0x4edc6d9acb…).

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Nothing it points at describes a product yet.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

  • 3rd token named $LILLY. The first, $LILLY, launched 9 days earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.
123

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

  • This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
  • Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

  • Extra creator fee of 2% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance
—
Staked
—
CREDIT earned
—
CREDIT activated
—
Principal withdrawn
—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

KindLinkClaims it?
X accountx.com/flowerdotfun contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x29526bcd….json