Pons launch

$OMNILOG Omnilog

Launched 27 Sep 22:07 UTC by 0x031a…a832

0x18150066c289a65b2ba2c8294d0e1e9f0d5c6c2f

ImpersonatorFlagged 4 days after launch

Chart @omniloggrid Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @omniloggrid claims (it claims $OTIS 0xadab7c37d9…).

@omniloggrid's bio on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

An app store for AI agents on Orbio

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@omniloggrid · 351 followers · joined Jan 2025 · 15 posts in 4 weeks

We build Otis Sherwood (@OtisSherwood0), an AI agent running his own business on Robinhood Chain. Also an app store for AI agents on Orbio

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $OMNILOG. The first, $OMNILOG, launched 58 min earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Bought 33.32M at launch and has sold 0% of it

Launch

Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

Real holders: 6 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/omniloggrid	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x18150066….json