Pons launch

$POP popcap.fun

Launched 27 Sep 22:24 UTC by 0x4c41…f1a7

0x134c2611673988f527f2020b9517bc32ce65c8a9

ImpersonatorFlagged 3 days after launch

Chart @popcapdotfunWebsiteExplorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @popcapdotfun claims (it claims $POP 0x9b05faa27b…).

@popcapdotfun's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project

Pop a cap. Pull a stock. Capsules of tokenized stocks on @RobinhoodCrypto — common to legendary, set by market cap. $POP coming soon.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

@popcapdotfun · 25 followers · joined Sep 2026 · 2 posts in 4 weeks

Pop a cap. Pull a stock. Capsules of tokenized stocks on @RobinhoodCrypto — common to legendary, set by market cap. $POP coming soon.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $POP. The first, $POP, launched 2.6 h earlier. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched nothing else within a week of this one
Bought 12.22M at launch and has sold 100% of it

Launch

Nobody bought in the launch block itself

Holders

Real holders: 58 after 30 min

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	popcap.fun	named names the ticker or project, not this contract
X account	x.com/popcapdotfun	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x134c2611….json