Pons launch

$AUTONOMY tryautonomy

Launched 04 Oct 00:17 UTC by 0x0d19…9545

0x04f0b32eb38a0a419aa818ad25ee2990f52ae6ce

ImpersonatorFlagged 18.6 h after launch

Chart @tryautonomy Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Market numbers come from Orbio and cover Orbio agents only.

Is this the project's token?

Not the token @tryautonomy claims (it claims $Autonomy 0x6a622126fb…).

@tryautonomy's post on X

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

@tryautonomy · 1,236 followers · joined Oct 2026 · 1 post in 4 weeks

A new species of intelligence, born onchain.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

2nd token named $AUTONOMY. The first, $Autonomy, launched 1.3 h earlier, straight on Pons. Check which one the project claims.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

In launch order, coloured by verdict. This one is ringed.

Creator

This wallet launched 1 other token within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 1 other launch; 1 was an impersonator
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

No extra creator fee: a trade pays only Pons’s 1%

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
X account	x.com/tryautonomy	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0x04f0b32e….json