File No. 1167 · Orbio agent

$CHOOK Chat Hook

Launched 04 Oct 14:26 UTC by 0x4a76…1e07

0xa6e7695dc69f1ce88249598af5e3a0159e0fc1ea

ImpersonatorFlagged under 2 min after launch

Chart Website Explorer

Market cap—

24h volume—

Price—per token, in USD

Bonding curve

—

24h buys / sells

—

Real holders

—

Agent balance

—

Is this the project's token?

Not the token superhooks.dev claims (it claims $SHOOKS 0x9de495b746…).

superhooks.dev

An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.

The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.

Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.

The project

Chat and create a hook.

The token description, written by whoever launched it.

Score

Not scored

Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.

Trader’s card

Original or copy

First token named $CHOOK

Creator

This wallet launched 11 other tokens within a week of this one
It hasn't sold out of any of its 11 other launches; 11 were impersonators
New wallet: first active 25 Sep 2026
Didn't buy at launch

Owner and fees

Extra creator fee of 3% on every buy and sell, on top of Pons’s 1%. It was fixed at launch and goes into the agent’s fees

From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.

Agent treasury

Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.

Spendable balance

—

Staked

—

CREDIT earned

—

CREDIT activated

—

Principal withdrawn

—

Who it points at

The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts.

Kind	Link	Claims it?
Website	superhooks.dev	contradicted claims a different contract

Raw data for this file: 0xa6e7695d….json