$FIB FIB
0xa315f07b0dc1ad5479ab0865eb9b869aa90c4036
0xa315f07b0dc1ad5479ab0865eb9b869aa90c4036
No. Not the token @sharpedotac claims (it claims $SHRP 0xb961886115…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
long short on the fibonacci's.
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio. It has collected 5,974 ORBIO in fees so far.
An agent’s trading fees mint CREDIT to its wallet. Activating CREDIT turns it into compute, so this is $FIB putting its budget to work, day by day.
$FIB hasn’t put any of its CREDIT to work yet: its fees have minted 47.17 CREDIT to its wallet.
From the chain: CREDIT’s activations by its agent wallet, every wallet it has had included; a wallet shared with other agents is split by what each one’s fees minted. What it spends after activating only its own account can see. Which agents put CREDIT to work →
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts. Dossier reads them throughout a launch's first day. After that it reads them again while people trade the token or look at its file: opening a file last read over a day ago queues a fresh read.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| Website | sharpe-sooty.vercel.app/coins/4602abeeaaaa469685fa3a9fefa6724b | not checked |
| X account | x.com/sharpedotac | contradicted
read |
Raw data for this file: 0xa315f07b….json