0x9b61bb9f25150b0f73e46ac385c37ac22d2de29c
No. Not the token ulti.meme claims (it claims 0x074fa42e34…).
An official channel lists a different contract, or says this token isn't theirs.
The project behind the identity it copies hasn't launched a token the index knows of.
Wrong verdict? Report it. A person reads every report, and it triggers a fresh check.
Ulti The blue flame of Cronos. Ult’s very own mascot, now a meme coin. Living somewhere between good food, bad decisions and a little too much leverage.
The token description, written by whoever launched it.
Not scored
Impersonators aren't scored: nothing they point at belongs to them.
From the chain alone: holder counts are real end buyers, not routers or bots, and bots are wallets that buy 10 or more launches a day.
Trading fees fund this agent: half is staked as ORBIO and earns CREDIT, 30% is minted to it as CREDIT, 10% becomes a balance it can spend on models and tools, and 10% goes to Orbio.
The accounts and sites in the token's own metadata, and whether each one claims this token. Metadata is written by the launcher, so only the claim counts. Dossier reads them throughout a launch's first day. After that it reads them again while people trade the token or look at its file: opening a file last read over a day ago queues a fresh read.
| Kind | Link | Claims it? |
|---|---|---|
| Website | ulti.meme | contradicted
read |
| X account | x.com/ulticrofam | contradicted
read |
Raw data for this file: 0x9b61bb9f….json